Bias in Abstinence-Only Education Essay

In addition to world an in in force(p) deterrent to casteless gestation and familiarly transmitted diseases, self-denial single education prevents young women from do well informed decisions about their sexuality. Cases of young pregnancy and STD/HIV infections is on the rise despite the government activity allocating funds for abstinence only computer platforms. This musical composition seeks to look at the government policies with regard to abstinence-only education programs and its relationship with unwished pregnancies.It is a known fact that sexual abstinence is being upright in all countries in the world as a sure as shooting way of preventing sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy. Men and women of all ages who be non ready to accept the risks that accompany sexual activity embrace abstinence which is a normal and acceptable practice. As a way of expressing love, warmheartedness and tenderness, majority resort to intercourse and sexual activity.Sex is a lso being mathematical functiond by couples to lace their relationships. However, it has often been argued that using sex to cementum relationships can distort ones judgment. Among women, having sex may strengthen the feeling of love but do not actually cement or blockheadeden the relationship.Exploring sexual behavior within an environment of deep commitment where having children is considered as a possibility is always rewarding. Majority of flock are however not prepared for commitment hence favour for abstinence until they develop a stable relationship.Abstinence is 100% heart and soulive in protecting an individual from sexually transmitted. However, if the majority of the population could earn its effectiveness, then we would not be having such headlines like the ones we have seen in the past of teen births being on the rise. However, abstinence is not an prosperous practice considering how strong sexual drives are among humans.The rate of teen births steady declined since 1991 and this could have been because of the intensive educational campaigns that were initiated during that period. These campaigns included encouraging people to use cautionarys and condoms and enlightening people on the risks of Aids and sexually transmitted diseases. However, like a shot statistics now show an increase by 3% in teen births the first time ever in 14 years. (Wilson, Kelly, Patricia,2005) Is it that the sex education programs that the government adopted are no longer working?The government has tried to show just about effort in curbing STDs and friendless pregnancies. The first federal abstinence-only program was enacted in 1981 and this was designed primarily to reinforcement pregnant and parenting teenagers. This came through the adolescent Family Life Act which was also passed the corresponding year. AFLA also funded abstinence-only programs meant to encourage responsibility and self discipline among teenagers (Abstinence Only Programs 2008, p.2).Abs tinence-only programs purpose was to teach the general population and especially the teenagers how they concentrate to gain from abstinence. It also sought to teach abstinence from pre-marital to all reading children. The abstinence-only program was supposed to teach the values of abstinence with regard to unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. According to this program, the expected standard of human sexual activity revolved around a mutually faithful monandrous relationship. However, with all these well clarified goals, current scientific research shows that this program is ineffective.A study of abstinence-only-until marriages program inferred that the classes fail to serve its goal of delaying the attack of sexual activity the young people. An evaluation of 11 of these programs showed that they do not have a lasting positive effect on the neuter behavior of young people (Ibid 4). Instead of a positive effect on the young people they showed a negative willin gness to use contraceptive because the program emphasized on contraceptive failure.It has often been reiterated that abstinence-only programs endanger the youths because adolescents are denied complete information. These programs fail to provide contraception information and in some cases, they have been accused of providing wrong information which may lead to youths repudiation contraceptive use.Teens are exposed to pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases because of lack of responsible sex education. Only safer sex intervention can drop unprotected sexual intercourse as compared to abstinence only programs. The federal official Fund for abstinence -only programs have negatively influenced schools. Avery good example involves the Gloucester noble school in Massachusetts with the summer vacations beginning 17 girls at the school are expecting babies (Kathleen Kingsbury, Wednesday June 18, 2008).This proves further the failure of the program to curb pre-marital pregnancies. In order to reduce the prevalence of this at the school a topical anaesthetic pediatrician advocated for the prescription of contraceptives. However, this has been met with hostility. Amazingly it is the desire of these teens to get pregnant and this only proves how distorted their perception towards life is.